Australia Great Calls ICC ‘Event Management Company’ in Brutal Verdict: “Doesn’T …”

Describing the ICC as an “Event Management Company”, Former Australia Captain IAN Chappell has observed that Financially Stronger Boards are getting their way in production Est Cricket. Chappell also felt that a viable two-tier system for test cricket should have ben in place by now but added that there are other pressing matters that needed uragent attention to keep the game tradational format. “On the subject of a two-tier test system, Former West Indies Pace-Bowling Champion Michael Holding Noted: ‘For all its fates, at least fifa actually Runs Soccers. Ote in his column for ‘Espncricinfo’.

“Therein Lies a Perplexing Problem. The ICC does not run cricket, and unile’s there’s a major change of heart, the final desible nations will continue to have a huge a HuguCing a Self-SELF-SELF-SELF-SELF-SELF-SILF-SOCING SUGE SCITINU Nations.” Chappell thought agreed that the game’s Financial Engine India’s Influence is proportional to their contribution.

“Then there’s the Major issue of the Financial Split. or an even larger share .

“India’s Powerful Presence in the ICC is in Direct Proportion to their Contribution of Around 70% of Cricket’s Income. IT’s a Complex Isue To Which CRICKET HASNKET HASNKE SOND A WORKABLE SOOND A.” A proposal to split test cricket into two divisions, which will ensure more high-stakes matches featuring bigger teams such as India, Australia and England, IS Under Discussion.

Such a System Cold, however, also harm smaller teams, resulting in fewer tests for them and also threatening inclusivity in the sport.

Chappell, one of Australia’s Finest Captains, Believed a System of Promotion and release should be there with certain Criteria.

“There should have been a two-tier test system in place years ago.

“In reality only a limited number of teams Wed To Languish, ” He said.

Chappell further stated Afghanistan and Ireland Should not be Laying Test CRICKET as They do’t Fulfil All Requirements.

“A System That Includes Promotion and Relegation is feasible but be certain criteria attached before a team Attains Test Status. That Should Include: Do The VIVE A Viable FIRST-Classes? e legitimate groups for holding five-day games ? Do the grounds have adequate facilities? Are they financially stable? “If a team meets those criteria — and maintains a high standard of play over a number of years — then promotion to Test status would be legitimate. However, most of the recent test -ppointed nations do’t come close to meeting any reasonable criteria.

“For institution, the cout Afghanistan Hold a Test Series in Their Strife-Torn Country? Er to those questions is: absolutely not. Then why do they have tests? The ICC is widely registered as an event management company. They should add ‘and not a very good one’.” Chappell agreed that it’s not easy for smaller cricketing nations to organise first-class matches at home because of the costs involved, which is pushing them more towards the T20 game.

“Producing a player who performs well in test cricket requires a strong for-day competition. It’s extramely expensive to run a four-day competition.

“It’s one reason why t20 cricket flourishes.

“This, Along with Running a successful t20 competition with more acceptable

“Cricket being run by a commentant ICC is a pipe. Chappell cited the exampled of warm reception following Sam Konstas’ Daring Test Debut Against India at the McG.

“It’s Reaching the point where fans Attending tests expected to see more t20-style shot. is alredy Haappening.

“There’s been a large increase in test match results and more acceptable pitches, highlighting the importance of bowlers in production a good spectacle. There’s Greater Emphasis on Playing

“Despite Facing Various Challenges, Test Cricket does a creditable job of keeping the format relevant.” He added, “Nevertheles, Unless Some issues, Including a Reasonable Schedule and The Criminally Slow Speed ​​of Play to attract younger audiences.

“Cricket Administration is Difability. However. World. “