After a long debate, the Waqf Amendment Bill also passed in the Rajya Sabha. Now it will be sent to the President, from where this law will be made after getting approval. Earlier, in the politics of Bihar, many questions have started echoing with Zoro whether Nitish Kumar may have to raise the side effect of opening the Waqf Amendment Bill within the party? Did the opposition parties divided to save the land of Muslim vote, have become one in Parliament? Reason, after the support of Nitish Kumar’s party on the Waqf Amendment Bill, resentment among Muslim leaders has come out openly.
JDU leader and Shia Waqf Board Chairman Afzal Abbas said that there is anger in the Muslim people about the Waqf bill. In Bihar, the chairman of the Shia Waqf Board, who is also a JDU leader, says that the Muslim people who are in the public will have to understand Nitish Kumar.
The questions are not arising, but the era of resignations has also started running. JDU Minority Front State Secretary Mo Nawaz Malik resigned after Nitish Kumar’s party came in support of the Waqf Bill. Nawaz Malik denied the support of the bill. Earlier, JDU leader Qasim Ansari resigned. Apart from these, State General Secretary of the Minority Department of JDU Mohammad Tabrez Siddiqui Alig also sent the resignation to Nitish Kumar.
JDU MLC Ghulam Gaus had already raised the question, and now JDU General Secretary Ghulam Rasool has also opposed the support of the bill.
Actually, Nitish Kumar and Chandrababu Naidu have supported the government despite the pressure of opposition and Muslim organizations. Nitish Kumar’s party rejected even the argument of the Congress’s secularism. Now not only the Muslim leader of the party, the Muslim religious leaders are also talking about teaching a lesson by calling JDU a fraud. Nitish Kumar, who argued with secularism, separated from the NDA before Modi reached Delhi in 2014. Who kept arguing the Constitution on the matter of Hindu nation. Those Nitish Kumar’s party openly gave the government to the government on the Waqf Amendment Bill.
Backfire can be held in Bihar elections?
Now the question arises whether the backfire can raise the party in support of Nitish Kumar’s Waqf Bill on Muslim vote in Bihar elections? When Nitish Kumar’s party is surrounded by opposition and Muslim organizations, the party’s executive chairman has given a big statement by creating a dock of the interest and opposition of Muslims. Sanjay Jha has said that JDU did for Muslims neither Congress nor RJD. Sanjay Jha said during the discussion in the Rajya Sabha that passing the bill will benefit poor Muslims and Pasmanda will be with JDU.
Let me tell you that Nitish Kumar is the politician who has been the first to reversed the changing weather in politics. So will the Chief Minister of Bihar not understand the loss on the Waqf bill, which the opposition is expressing. Or Nitish Kumar has supported the loss of the loss of the Muslim vote for which the opposition is talking about the loss of JDU? Or Nitish Kumar, who has always joined the NDA, has always agreed that the Muslim vote will not matter. If you want to understand this politics, then you have to know the mathematics of Nitish’s Muslim vote first. Joe says that from 2009 to 2015, a large part of the Muslim vote has been found in the election of Nitish Kumar.
Muslim leaders wrote these things in their resignation
Mo. Qasim Ansari and Mo. Nawaz Malik wrote separate letters to Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar and said that he had lost the trust of Muslims, which believed that his party is secular. Ansari said in a letter written in Hindi that I am sad that I gave this party many years. At the same time, Malik said that the Waqf bill violates many fundamental rights given in the constitution.
Ansari wrote in his resignation, “I want to say with full respect that millions of Indian Muslims like us had unwavering belief that you are completely secular ideology flag bearers. But now this belief is broken. Millions of dedicated Indian Muslims and activists are deeply hurt by this stance of JD (U). It is against Indian Muslims and it is not possible to accept it. It is a matter of regret that I gave this party many years. ”
On the other hand, State Secretary of JDU Minority Cell, Mo. Nawaz Malik also resigned from the party expressing displeasure over the support of the Waqf Bill. In his resignation to Nitish Kumar, Malik wrote, “Millions of Indian Muslims had unwavering confidence that you are completely the flag bearer of secular ideology. But now this faith is broken. The JDU’s stance on the Waqf Amendment Bill has been deeply hurt by the JDU’s attitude.
Nitish’s party continues to get Muslim votes
Till 2009, 2010, Nitish Kumar continued to get Muslim votes from 21 to 62 pieces in Bihar even after fighting with BJP, which slowly decreased to contest elections with NDA. But Nitish Kumar’s party still continued to get votes in the Muslim -dominated seat. The big reason for this was that since coming to power in November 2005, there were many important knocks related to Muslims in Nitish’s decisions. Such as the siege of the cemetery, the formation of the Judicial Investigation Committee of the Bhagalpur riots, and implementing the decision of 20 per cent of the backward reservation, including sections of the Muslim community. Between 2006 and 2014, Nitish Kumar sent five Muslim leaders to the Rajya Sabha. Among them, four Pasmanda were Muslims. But now politics and situation are changing. Then the support of the Waqf Bill can reduce Nitish’s remaining Muslim vote?
It is possible that in Bihar politics, Nitish Kumar’s support from supporting the Waqf Bill should not be benefited or Congress. There is a need to look at some of the reasons for this. The government could not form the government even if RJD wanted to cut AIMIM votes in Bihar last time. This time, there is a public party of Prashant Kishore along with Owaisi’s party in Bihar. In November 2024, by-elections were held in 4 seats in Bihar, where PK’s party won the votes, the four seat NDA won. In such a situation, is Nitish Kumar understanding that those who have been taking decisions on the issue of Muslims, they will continue to get the vote related to it, the opposition will not benefit greatly by distributing the rest of the Muslim votes?
-
-
-
-
